Procedural History: 15/20 (not sure what you meant with regards to the 5th and 6th Circuits’ holdings; applicants are seeking emergency relief from the U.S. Supreme Court)
Facts: 15/20 (missing the language of the mandate and the issuance of the emergency rule; be more methodical about each section, i.e. think about the order of events)
Issue/Holding: 15/20 (issue was correct, but could be more a bit more explicit/holding is missing a summary of the court’s reasoning; the court writing the opinion is the U.S. Supreme Court, not a trial court)
Rules: 5/20 (missing the rule that describe what OSHA is empowered to do, i.e. ensure occupational safety that is safe and healthful working conditions; missing the rule that states the exception to ordinary notice-and-comment procedures for emergency temporary standards)
Analysis/Application: 0/20 (the Court’s analysis states that the mandate falls outside of OSHA’s purview based on the rules above, and that COVID-19 is not an occupational hazard)
Missing highlighted case: -5